Bob Smith on Energy & Oil
Republican Sr Senator (NH; retired 2002)
Use coal & oil as well as seeking alternatives
Q: Do you support or oppose replacing coal & oil with alternatives?
A: Continue domestic oil exploration along with developing alternatives.
Source: Email interview on 2010 Senate race with OnTheIssues.org
Mar 4, 2010
Cap-and-trade has huge costs for utilities & taxpayers
CAP AND TRADE: This is another big government-fabricated issue. There is no private sector demand for this. It will saddle power providers with huge costs which will ultimately be borne by the taxpayers in their utility bills.
It will be a regulatory nightmare. I saw this issue first hand when I was the Chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. The liberals were wrong then and they are still wrong now! This is driven by the
United Nations global warming crowd. The United States must not impose this kind of nonsense on our taxpayers and businesses. What about China and other big polluters?
They pollute at will with no costs imposed on them. They are saving their money to buy our T bills. Which is another issue!
Source: Campaign website, www.friendsofsenatorbobsmith.com
Mar 4, 2010
Global climate treaty stifles US economy
I am concerned about commiting to a legally binding pact which would force the US to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2010, while exempting “developing nations,” such as China, India, Korea, and Mexico. I do not believe this agreement
addresses American interests equitably and would force the US to “go it alone” in emissions reductions, thereby stifling our economy and relinquishing our competitive edge in the global market.
Source: senate.gov/~smith “Smith on the Issues”
Aug 30, 1999
Supports CWA, alternative fuels, & pollution credits
Sen. Smith supports the following programs regarding America’s environment and natural resources:
Source: 1996 National Political Awareness Test
Jul 2, 1996
- Strengthen the Clean Water Act.
- Encourage development of alternative fuels and electric cars to reduce pollution.
- Promote the selling of
pollution credits to encourage industries to decrease amount of pollution.
Voted NO on drilling ANWR on national security grounds.
Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Murkowski Amendment No. 31323; To create jobs for Americans, to reduce dependence on foreign sources of crude oil and energy, to strengthen the economic self determination of the Inupiat Eskimos and to promote national security. Would allow gas and oil development in a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge if the president certifies to Congress that production in the area is in the nation's security and economic interests (qwhich Prsident Bush would). If the cloture motion is agreed to, debate will be limited and a vote will occur. If the cloture motion is rejected debate could continue indefinitely and instead the bill is usually set aside. A yea vote for this bill was one in favor of drilling in the reserve. Three-fifths of the total Senate (60) is required to invoke cloture.
; vote number 2002-71
on Apr 18, 2002
Voted YES on terminating CAFE standards within 15 months.
Levin Amendment No. 2997; To provide alternative provisions to better encourage increased use of alternative fueled and hybrid vehicles. Vote to pass an amendment that would remove the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standard (CAFE) and instead establish a new automobile efficiency standard in 15 months. Congress could veto any CAFE increase and would be allowed to increase the standard if no changes are made with 15 months. The bill would overhaul the nation's energy policies by restructuring the electricity system and providing for $16 billion in energy-related tax incentives.
; vote number 2002-47
on Mar 13, 2002
Voted NO on preserving budget for ANWR oil drilling.
Vote to preserve language in the Fiscal Year 2001 Budget Framework that assumes $1.2 billion in revenue from oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge [ANWR] in Alaska.
Bill S Con Res 101
; vote number 2000-58
on Apr 6, 2000
Voted NO on ending discussion of CAFE fuel efficiency standards.
Senators Feinstein (D-CA) and Bryan (D-NV) introduced a resolution expressing the sense of the Senate towards ending CAFE Standards. Senator Gorton motioned to table this amendment. [A YES vote is considered pro-business].
Status: Amdt Rejected Y)40; N)55; NV)4
Reference: Gorton Amdt # 1677;
Bill H.R. 2084
; vote number 1999-275
on Sep 15, 1999
Voted YES on defunding renewable and solar energy.
In June of 1999, Senator Jeffords (R-VT) was prepared to offer an amendment which would have added $62 million to the Energy Department solar and renewable energy programs. This action was blocked by Senator Reid (D-NV).
Status: Motion Agreed to Y)60; N)39; NV)1
Reference: Motion to table the recommital;
Bill S. 1186
; vote number 1999-171
on Jun 16, 1999
Voted YES on approving a nuclear waste repository.
Approval of the interim nuclear waste repository. The repository would be located at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, with an integrated management system for storage and permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. Voting YES would authorize the President with sole and unreviewable discretion to determine the suitability of the Yucca Mountain site.
Status: Bill Passed Y)65; N)34; NV)1
Reference: Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1997;
Bill S. 104
; vote number 1997-42
on Apr 15, 1997
Voted NO on do not require ethanol in gasoline.
Funding a mandated percentage of market share for the use of ethanol in gasoline, to be funded b reducing NASA budget b $39 million..
Status: Table Motion Agreed to Y)50; N)50; VP decided YES
Reference: Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1995;
Bill H.R. 4624
; vote number 1994-255
on Aug 3, 1994
Page last updated: Nov 26, 2010